Architecting the Future of Procurement Technology

Building a Kaleidoscope of Opportunities

May 17, 2024

Introduction

The Procurement Technology landscape is undergoing a dramatic shift. One that recently lead me to term it a "SuperNova moment".

This drastic change has shattered old paradigms, beliefs, and standards, dispersing the remnants of monolithic, traditional solutions to seed the development of nimbler, more specialised satellite solutions.

In the current aftermath these debris and innovation seeds must consolidate.

Designed to meet up with specific niche needs, best of breed solutions cannot function in isolation. They are under constant gravitational pull towards an integrated, modern and cohesive Procurement Technology stack to truly deliver significant value.

Companies who understand this, move away from simple feature match.

They are seeking capabilities that innovate, integrate, complement, and enhance the entirety of a technology stack and augment user journeys without limiting flexibility.

This blog post explores structural elements and pillars that provide flexibility and coherence to a contemporary Procurement Technology architecture—elements critical for crafting a seamless and modern work experience.

We have the choice to choose architectures that not only offer a kaleidoscope of digital possibilities but also deeply humanises work.

This entry marks the first instalment of four recently announced posts that delve into the backbone and nervous system of modern Procurement Technology.

For links to the previous articles and information on upcoming posts, please check the navigation at the bottom of this article.

The Critical role of Architectural Frameworks

Just as no object in the universe can escape the effects of gravity, fragmented procurement solutions cannot escape the pull towards each other, seeking integration. Without a unifying architectural framework, these solutions remain disparate, underutilised silos providing limited leverage.

To progress and realise their capabilities, these solutions require a solid blueprint, robust scaffolding, and supporting pillars, all elements that form a cohesive, scalable, and efficiently integrated framework.

An architecture which includes intelligence and a control centre that orchestrates and directs the pulse of activities and data exchanges across the network, similar to how an ERP system integrates various business processes into a unified tracking of financials or flight operation centres orchestrate all aspects and activities of an airport.

Ordering the Chaos for seamless integration

Architectural frameworks bring order to chaos, ensuring that each Procurement solution fits into its intended role friction-less and slot into a larger ecosystem.

They enable a smooth flow of processes and data streams, weaving together the rich fabric necessary to elevate digital procurement into a strategic asset.

Modern architectures are not just a technical choice but a linchpin for organisational agility in Procurement and rapid adaptation required without incurring major technical debt.

3 major characteristics i find to describe a contemporary technology architecture for Procurement best include:

Composability providing the flexibility to introduce new modules or building blocks or remove outdated components without disrupting the entire system. An architecture which can dynamically adjust with limited interdependencies.
End-to-end Integration of flows to ensure communication across solutions through standardised components, orchestrated processes and commonly shared data assets, rules and policies. This ensures that satellite solutions are brought back into undisrupted use.
An obsession with User Experience and Simplicity driving design decisions with a human-centric view, ensuring that the technological complexity is masked behind simplicity and elegance.

Is there a reference for an optimal architecture?

There certainly are archetypes and good architecture practices but to modernise a Procurement Technology stack, one-size doesn’t fit all and need to be looked at individually.

An evaluation needs to capture:

Your Starting Point: The current state of your process and technology maturity, including both internal and outsourced capabilities.
Your Ambition: The strategic goals and objectives of your procurement function including the surrounding ecosystem of partners, stakeholders etc. and your digital transformation vision.
Your Growth Plan: An anticipation of key business needs evolving from regulatory needs, business model changes, market shifts

The best architecture is without doubt, the one that fits your current needs while providing the flexibility to reconfigure work processes and integrate new components as they emerge.

Peeling back the Architecture layers

Understanding the different components that contribute to a comprehensive architecture helps in dissecting the complexity of modern Procurement Technology.

These components, or layers, cannot be analysed in silo but are building up the slates which build the traversal foundations and pillars of the architecture.

Following the previous characteristics mentioned, a great Procurement Technology Architecture has to simplify work for humans without compromising on the vision and ambitions of the company.

Getting this right is not easy, given that in most companies legacy architectures and technology debt may prevent a rapid modernisation.

Having therefore the flexibility to use complementing approaches to enhance a given architecture stack without the effort of replacing large chunks is therefore crucial.

I have still to come across anyone who does have the luxury to start with a blank slate and totally Greenfield.

Key drivers determining your architecture needs

To support an assessment of the current state of your Procurement Technology stack and identify areas for improvement, consider an assessment which validates your architecture on 7 key drivers or characteristics:

Answering these questions in addition to conducting a comprehensive Capability Maturity Assessment sheds light on the current state of your architecture and the possible gaps or transformation needs and helps to build your Target Architecture.

The aftermath of the Supernova - choose your archetype

While there are several archetypes in Procurement Architecture, the choice of the right model depends heavily on the specific needs and strategic direction of the organisation itself.

It needs to find a balance between enterprise-wide architecture standards and the ability to cater for the specificities of the Procurement domain.

Find below 3 possible archetypes following current discussions in the field of Procurement Technology,

These archetypes have their own specific strategic orientation, strengths, and challenges, have a varying degree of complementation and in practice will be overlapping to some degree:

Innovation through “Best of Breed” solutions caters to agility and deep functionality, complementing existing architectures through point-specific solutions. In its most puristic form, a lack of cohesion and integration challenges creates a shadow on the potential of this archetype, limiting a unified and seamless user experience and leverage of AI or Automation.
A “consolidated Monolith” with a robust and integrated set of solutions builds a solid backbone for organisations needing an all-in-one solution with limited flexibility for change. This archetype model focuses on leveraging existing Enterprise solutions and the pace of their specific innovation roadmaps. The advantage of their integration is often at the expense of flexibility and average functionality.
A sea of “Connected Constellations” combines the strengths of a consistent experience and seamless integration of a monolithic strategy with the modular flexibility of best-of-breed solutions through a common process and data orchestration layer, redirecting work to be organised and presented to users in a simplified and intuitive manner.

Choosing the right architectural archetype is not just a technical decision but a strategic one that will define the trajectory of an organisation's procurement capabilities.

The chosen archetype should not only address current requirements but also be adaptable enough to evolve with future demands and technological advancements.

Whether it's adopting a single consolidated monolith, a flexible best-of-breed approach, or a hybrid constellation, the key is to ensure that the architecture can support the goals of an organisations future at a rapid speed, without becoming the limiting factor for growth.

And this is were a composable architecture, touted here as a connected Constellation, provides a key differentiator in my opinion.

A detailed evaluation of these 3 archetypes will form part of a separate post.

Composability opens up a Kaleidoscope of Opportunities

Like the stars forming constellations in the night sky, a composable architecture offers a dynamic and adaptable platform that allows organisations to reimagine how they view and utilise their core metadata and orchestrate these building blocks to align with procurement goals and human-centred work.

Adjusting the composition and arrangement of business rules, processes and data models, much like adjusting the lenses of a kaleidoscope, enables organisations to shift and adapt without extensive overhauls, providing a competitive edge.

This principle promotes the strategic reuse of business components from existing systems, such as Source to Pay, Contracts, or Sourcing solutions. It sparks innovation and creativity, enabling the seamless orchestration of workflow interactions and data exchanges.

This synergy enhances the use of AI and automation, boosting efficiency and generating valuable insights.

Humanising Work

The ultimate goal of any procurement technology architecture should be to enhance the work experience for humans in Procurement, at suppliers and with users in all business units and sites.

A composable architecture supports this by reducing the current complexity of multi-tool toggling and focusing on user-centric design. It ensures that technology serves the needs of its users, rather than users having to adapt to the technology.

It starts and ends with a human in mind.

This human-centric approach is vital for boosting adoption, satisfaction, and ultimately, productivity key factors which have left users underwhelmed with current traditional solutions and their backing architecture.

Conclusion: A Blueprint for the Future

Developing a robust architectural framework is like drafting a blueprint for future success.

It ensures that as your procurement technology landscape evolves, you are well-prepared to integrate new solutions, respond to emerging business challenges, and capitalise on a kaleidoscope of adjustable opportunities.

Engage with me and the ProcureTech community

Share your view and experience with Procurement Technologies, their strengths, challenges and adoption flaws.

Read the posts, share your insights, and discuss how you are pereceiving these changes and their impact on business practices.

Call to Action

Let me know in the comments what you think is essential to be covered in a contemporary Procurement Technology stack.

What would you think are top priorities to modernise solutions and their architecture?

Do you have any preference for one of the archetypes mentioned earlier?

Process Automation Pulse

Discussion about this post